tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5446950841416046104.post5247422588106086160..comments2009-06-08T12:23:45.627-07:00Comments on Ok: Why Atheism pisses me off.Droppa MaPantshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09109726850706167842noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5446950841416046104.post-27679379531180001992009-06-08T12:23:45.627-07:002009-06-08T12:23:45.627-07:00I agree wholeheartedly with you Swede, the odds ar...I agree wholeheartedly with you Swede, the odds are on the atheist side. <br /><br />Saying that proving or disproving god does not exist doesnt matter is considered an apathetic agnostic view of the world (one I share), that if god exists (a big if) she/she/it is doing a poor job of making itself known. But most of the evidence points to no. Still, however unlikely it is a god exists, there is still a possibility.Droppa MaPantshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09109726850706167842noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5446950841416046104.post-40761057526356877492009-06-07T15:45:23.966-07:002009-06-07T15:45:23.966-07:00Disproving the existence of a god doesn't real...Disproving the existence of a god doesn't really matter since he/she/it existing or not doesn't seem to have any impact on the world as we know it. Know it through observation and deduction using the scientific method to validate our knowledge that is. Not know it as from reading the bible or some other collection of stories.<br /><br />It all comes down to common sense in the end. You can't prover a god exist and I can't disprove it. But I can prove, to a great extent, that the natural world doesn't need an intervening god. Whereas you can't prove that it does. The best you can come up with is that it doesn't seem plausible to you that this great cosmos and the tiny, tiny speck of life that we know about could possibly have happened without a god.<br /><br />I'd say we, the atheists, have the odds on our side.Swedehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02827146355035365444noreply@blogger.com